ext_288895 ([identity profile] freerange-snark.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] alexxkay 2006-08-10 02:02 am (UTC)

Oooooooooooh, now I get it. Somehow it was just escaping me before. Yes, without the comma it does mean that any five-year term after the initial, not-get-out-of-able one, could be terminated with a year's notice. With the comma, anyone can terminate the contract at any time, so long as they warn the other party a year in advance.

Thankee, thankee. I couldn't figure out where the comma should go instead, but it just shouldn't be there at all. That was driving me bananas.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting