He *could* have claimed that -- but he didn't. His one excuse (that the article mentioned, at any rate) was "a very strong god whom Sanal might be worshipping obviously protected him," which was false. So he's at best misguided about what he's doing, and more likely a charlatan.
Not that I would have much respect for a self-described black magic user even if he *was* telling the truth.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-24 09:30 pm (UTC)Not that I would have much respect for a self-described black magic user even if he *was* telling the truth.