The bare bones seem to be that there was a dispute about who won the final round, or perhaps the means of the winning, which became so disputatious that it created a schism.
The whys and wherefores should be left to someone that was there, although I wouldn't be surprised if they weary of explaining it, 20+ years later.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: It ate my reply, 2nd attempt
Date: 2004-08-06 04:28 pm (UTC)The whys and wherefores should be left to someone that was there, although I wouldn't be surprised if they weary of explaining it, 20+ years later.